Money should be spent on creating new buildings such as museums or town halls rather than renovating the existing ones. to what extent do you agree or disagree?
[2:08 PM, 6/13/2019] Rubi: To begin with, for the creation of new constructions it is no doubt everything is needed more than the maintenance, including the labor forces to materials. While doing so, it is no doubt that the amount costs for an exorbitant. But, if we reconstruct the old buildings then it is definite that the work completion can be at a minimal price. For instance, if I tend to build a new house for me when I need to purchase each and everything, but in case of renovation, only a few things are being needed to get. That is the reason why I put my disagreement on it, since an amount would be saved.
In the same manner, old structures are the reflections of our culture, such as temple and old houses and many more. The risk of losing history and cultures grow bigger if we tend to build newer ones. As the upcoming buildings may have unique designs consisting present context, and if so then it is obvious the coming generations can remain unaware of our traditions cultures, etc since they can not get to see the older ones. To illustrate, older buildings in Kathmandu such as Pashupatinath Temple portrays a lot more about the Hindu religion, and many youngsters are familiar with the history of the temple, how it used to be worshipped to what values it carries, but, if it was completely given a new shape by destroying it, then many new generations cannot get to know about its values. That is the reason why for the sake of the protection of our culture maintenance is essential instead of making newer.
In conclusion, although some do have own views to turn out older building into a completely new, i completely disagree because of more costs and also due to a risk of losing previous history and cultures which are belong to us and our ancesters.
- some people think that the development of technology help to decrease crime and other people think that would encourage crime to discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- someone has returned your bag with all its belongings that you recently lost write a letter to thank that person thank him her explain how you left your bag explain why its belongings were important to you 95
- An item of clothing you purchased but found somewhat the issues with it, once you returned home.What the itemdescribes what was the issues with itand what you expect the manager to do 84
- Money should be spent on creating new buildings such as museums or town halls rather than renovating the existing ones. to what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- You recently bought a piece of equipment for your kitchen, but it did not work. You phoned the shop manager. Describe the problem with the equipment. Explain what happened when you phoned the shop. Say what you would like the manager do. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...t is no doubt that the amount costs for an exorbitant. But, if we reconstruct the old buildin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...previous history and cultures which are belong to us and our ancesters.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.565625 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73238499015 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.0832358623 49.4020404114 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.818181818 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0909090909 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14524499396 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514549520119 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266681526221 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956503407814 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0103973948132 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 11.3001002004 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.82 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.