More and more people prefer ebooks rather than paper books. What are the reasons for this? What problems can this cause for the libraries?
Nowadays, advancement in technology has lead to invention of ebooks. It is observed that majority of people are relying on ebooks than on paper books as compared with past. As ebooks are easy to carry and affordable, however this has serious adverse effect on libraries.
Undoubtedly, ebooks have gained more popularity today as electronic opt of books are weightless. This means one can carry as many books as with them while traveling around the world. Moreover, ebooks have cut down the cost of buying hard copy of books, as e-books are available by just pressing the download tab through nominal internet charges.
Nevertheless, the disadvantages associated with it cannot be overlooked. The increasing popularity of ebooks has resulted into shutdown of many libraries. People depending on ebooks do not feel the urge of visiting library and reading books over there. For example, a recent survey has shown that libraries might be extinct in near future.
In addition, unemployment rate is profusely rising for the librarians. This is because the employer cannot affordable to pay their staff due to less influx of people. Furthermore, the maintenance cost of libraries has also increased to many folds, as latest books, magazines and journals are needed to update in library. However less number people using libraries is directly affecting the profits, hence unable to keep up the libraries for further use by people.
To recapitulate, new invention in field of technology has gifted us ebooks but this has adversely affected the libraries. Though ebooks have no weight and are pocket friendly but this may result into vanishing of libraries in coming future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... e-books are available by just pressing the download tab through nominal internet charges. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as shown that libraries might be extinct in near future. In addition, unemploy...
^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of people. Furthermore, the maintenance cost of libraries has also increased to ...
^^
Line 7, column 332, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less numb'?
Suggestion: less numb
...e needed to update in library. However less number people using libraries is directly affe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 18, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...ther use by people. To recapitulate, new invention in field of technology has gifted us eb...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26119402985 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7906556517 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600746268657 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1469358901 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.125 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265923522807 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740458330149 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377300175481 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13410811875 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146647028225 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.