More people are now trying out different varieties of food which results in consumption of ingredients from different parts of the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development. Provide specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Nowadays, many food enthusiasts are experimenting with their food consumption abilities by including a variety of ingredients in their diet. Some people see it as a positive improvement while others are not in favor of this change. This essay will discuss why I strongly agree with this behavior of adding unique and out of the world ingredients in one's dish.
Firstly, consuming food items made of foreign ingredients enhances our knowledge of that particular cuisine. Additionally, it brings us closure to the cultural diversity of that country or region. This, in turn, can help us in being more accommodating while shifting base to other countries. For example, a person, who is accustomed to eating Chinese food like Hakka noodles or Schezwan Manchurian can survive in a country like China or Japan when he is traveling either for work or pleasure.
Moreover, expanding our database of ingredients can go a long way in generating more employment opportunities and local businesses. The introduction of a variety of cuisines results in setting up or expansion of the restaurant chain, which can lead to the generation of more jobs, thus bringing down the unemployment rate of the country. For instance, a recent survey revealed that the global business of multicuisine restaurants was much higher than that of a standalone cuisine restaurant. This proves that people are more interested in trying a variety of foodstuff in addition to traditional local cuisines.
In conclusion, I completely agree that introducing a vast variety of foreign elements in our diet would definitely bring us closure to the world and expand our knowledge base of food habitats of other countries. In addition, it will also benefit in bringing down the unemployment rate and increasing businesses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...que and out of the world ingredients in ones dish. Firstly, consuming food items ma...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24125874126 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08390220887 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583916083916 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6206606009 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.307692308 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178576600612 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609281576966 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047621795585 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103180078584 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571732760964 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.