Most societies have homeless people. Some people think that the best way to help them is to give them money.To what extent do you agree?
Our societies these days are more differentiating the classes of people than they ever used to be. The least fortunate ones, which tend to not have homes are often sympathied and are helped financially by the ones that can. I believe, however, that apart from monetary support, they also require moral support and guidance for betterment.
Supporting such needy people in financial matters is an obligation on humanitarian grounds. It is their basic wants and needs which are in question (i.e. kitchen money for running household, health management etc). This can hence also result in unwanted situations, like such people turning to illegal ways to earn money. According to a recent research carried by Dr. John Paul at Nepal University of Social Sciences, more than half of the street muggers caught by police are these least fortunate people without homes, that fall into such crimes under household duress.
However, getting someone’s financial needs supported is not only thing needed. This calls for more than monetary support. An old proverb sums it all, “Don’t give fish to someone, teach them how to fish”. Instead of making these people dependent on society, such people are needed to be morally supported as well. So as they can think of bigger picture and become self-sufficient. There are number of other ways, they can be helped, for example, they can be employed at some factories and taught with technical skills to counteract with their needs. They can even be helped to get formal education and get employed at some office.
It is therefore, I strongly believe that this calls for much more than just financial support for these homeless people. With a little financial and moral support, these people can turn out to be a good part of a progressive society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs supported" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'supporting' or 'to be supported'.
Suggestion: supporting; to be supported
... getting someone's financial needs supported is not only thing needed. This calls fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, apart from, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10135135135 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69454851 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611486486486 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5238700025 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.375 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116317591601 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386764530776 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0263105552195 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0694556050697 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.010693139502 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.