The increasing development of technology in this generation, it is clear that the most significant news can easily spread to the worldwide. While journalists tend to represent their justice and integrity for reporting the truth to the newsreader, I believe that modern people should always evaluate the resources and verify the truth.
To begin with, this is a war between integrity and benefit for most journalists. They have to deal with the pressure from the audience rating and the competition with the whole news industries. In order to attract more readers, journalists tend to report the exaggerating news or even report the fake news from the Internet without investigation. Moreover, the media has become a framing tool for the certain political party, so they can gain the benefit from their investment. Therefore, journalism has lost their duty and ethics to report the truth because of the pressure of rating and gain the benefits for survival.
However, there are still a few reporters or original resources that readers can observe the true information. We should always consider the common sense with the news we read. Although the media might try to lead the direction for their purposes, audiences can evaluate the several resources from the original report. For example, in terms of the US presidential election, there are numerous different reports on the TV channel due to different support of news companies. Media framing has become a common trend that people should always take careful consideration of the information they read. Therefore, living in the era of information explosion, people should always be cautious of the news they observe.
In conclusion, it may be difficult to see the change of news will always report the truth for the audience, but we can always do a little research for more information to find out the original story or integrity reports.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'numerous'.
Suggestion: numerous
...the US presidential election, there are numerous different reports on the TV channel due to differ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16233766234 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80150219926 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50974025974 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9182817332 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.571428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198003470821 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739603450828 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344971734741 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125382914232 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188635778078 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.