News stories on TV and in newspapers are often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is believed by some people that images presented along with the news stories on TV and newspapers are more persuasive as compared to the words. The statement carries much weight and there is not much concrete evidence available to suggest otherwise.
It can be said without any shadow of doubt that nowadays people can access to news stories from number of different media channels that includes online social media networks such as Facebook and Twitter. The life has become extremely fast and busy and the news can be accessed from the click of a button. People no longer prefer to read long texts and want to get precise and succinct information in the form of pictures without spending much time on single piece of information. For example, one piece of evidence to support this argument can be observed by how all the major news channels when broadcasting any news update on twitter mostly tweet with the pictures as any tweet without pictures generally do not engage much audience.
It has become a very common trend to present any news information along with an attractive or relevant photograph to attract the spectators. From the point of view of the public, people are occupied with their daily work and personal routines and want to access as much as news updates in the shortest amount of time possible without reading the detailed wordings. The only people who normally tend to read the full text news are the people for whom the news is directly relevant such as the news analysts or journalism students.
In conclusion, it is true that visualised news stories are much more effective than the one with plain texts as general public is not much concerned about nitty-gritty of the wording used as long as the main essence of the information is clear from the pictures with summarised points.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ective than the one with plain texts as general public is not much concerned about nitty-gritt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86774193548 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50498981743 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525806451613 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3939209165 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.9 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 20.7667163134 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175950921902 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772496339147 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559722545218 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11721365312 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168817676739 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.