News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures
- Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.
- What is your opinion about this
In our daily life, we see many photos or images of news events in newspapers and on television. Some people say that, the visualization is more effective than words but photos cannot tell more then they show. This essay will discuss why photos or pictures are more effective than words.
The idea that showing pictures is that effective way is obviously true, because our brain is trained to memorized things quickly if information is in the form of picture or photos, brain has more visualization power. We can easily recollect the things from picture. For example, we can easily remember movie story rather than reading a story books in addition, young people don’t like reading recently, they are used to collect the information from the internet rather than reading books for them images should be much more effective than reading every single letters. For this reason pictures are more effective than words.
Conversely, pictures cannot tell more than they show. We cannot predict anything from the picture for example, In news we offense see murder picture, you can see a facial expression of a murder in the picture, but you never know his history or habits without reading an investigation about him picture cannot tell you hall story or truth behind it.
In conclusion, Pictures are more effective than words, but we should be more flexible to accept reading words as well as watching images, not escaping from letters. We have to try to collect the balanced information from media, not only by the pictures, but also valuable words.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... than words but photos cannot tell more then they show. This essay will discuss why ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctures are more effective than words. The idea that showing pictures is that e...
^^^^
Line 2, column 422, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to collecting'.
Suggestion: used to collecting
...'t like reading recently, they are used to collect the information from the internet rathe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, so, then, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01158301158 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49376617281 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517374517375 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.8072315739 49.4020404114 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316041640809 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150414572907 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101874578443 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20557604945 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617143306188 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.