Nowadays individuals take their family with them to abroad whenever they go for a business trip. What are the advantages and disadvantages on individual and on his/her family?
With the advent of modern civilization, there has been a radical change in way people do things. They are known to let their loved ones join them in their official meetings in other location, not a case in yesteryears. Unarguably, there are certain merits associated with this practice including opportunity to spend extra time with their family, along with preparing their children to take bigger roles in future. However, numerous drawbacks including work disturbance and negative impact on relationship, have proven to be true in nature.
Undoubtedly, humans today are known to have a wider mindset. And for this reason, they are enthusiastic with the idea of having their family members beside them, every time they get chance of. Therefore, these trips enhance their chance of spending more time with their dear ones. And because of these trips, family members are less accustomed to feel deprived, a normal thing these days because of work overload. Moreover, it helps in making younger generation get ready for the future responsibilities, as they would be the one taking over. To exemplify, one of the article from economic times revealed that most business class people in today’s generation fancy involving respective family members in their enterprise in order to divide responsibilities. Eventually, resulting in creation of an organized work life balance for them.
Although, there are some good advantages that one can have by following this practice, there are certain demerits that can cause adverse effects. Having family members on a work trip can cause disturbance at crucial times. In other words, they may cause humiliation by attending unauthorized meetings and official parties. Moreover, family may not enjoy accompanying their spouse to these trips as their spouse’s are bound to work, instead of having a gala time with their loved ones. This in turn, can have a detrimental impact on their relationship, which sometime leads to life changing decisions. One such example of this is of my uncle and his family. Because of his regular meetings, he had to take his family along with him. This actually backfired and became the root cause of their divorce. Furthermore, these trips are generally known to be short in nature, hence proving to be nothing but a vacation for other family members.
To conclude, no one can deny the fact that there has been a surge wherein business trips are not limited merely to business these days. People are known to take advantage of these trips by on boarding their family members as this not only provides them with extra family time, but also helps in providing exposure to the upcoming generation, making them experienced enough to take on larger roles. Having said that, disadvantages like disturbing effect on relationship, as well as, work related disturbance, are going to exist side by side.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 405, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ing their children to take bigger roles in future. However, numerous drawbacks including ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: APOSTROPHE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Consider using the plural form here: 'spouses'.
Suggestion: spouses
...ng their spouse to these trips as their spouse’s are bound to work, instead of having a ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 813, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oot cause of their divorce. Furthermore, these trips are generally known to be sh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 24.0651302605 208% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2407.0 1615.20841683 149% => OK
No of words: 466.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1652360515 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74154291973 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525751072961 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 775.8 506.74238477 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7634479929 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.652173913 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2608695652 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30434782609 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304983861906 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866675458022 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662582592318 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202142096515 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392563740598 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.