Nowadays individuals take their family with them to abroad whenever they go for a business trip. What are the advantages and disadvantages on individual and on his/her family?
With the advent of modern civilization, there has been a radical change in way people do things. They are known to let their loved ones join them on their official trips, not a case in yesteryears. Unarguably, there are certain merits associated with this practice including opportunity to spend extra time with their family, along with preparing their children to take bigger roles in future. However, numerous drawbacks including work disturbance and negative impact on relationship, have proven to be true in nature.
Undoubtedly, humans today are known to have a wider mindset. And for this reason, they are enthusiastic with the idea of having their family members beside them, every time they get chance of. Therefore, these trips enhance their chance of spending more time with their dear ones. And because of these trips, family members are less accustomed to feel deprived, a normal thing these days because of work overload. Moreover, it helps in making younger generation get ready for the future responsibilities, as they would be the one taking over. These trips enables them to gain interest in business, along with vacationing. To exemplify, one of the article from economic times revealed that most business class people in today’s generation fancy involving respective family members in their enterprise in order to make them ready for future roles. Eventually, resulting in making the upcoming generation gain meaningful insights of work and preparing them well ahead of time.
Although, there are some good advantages that one can have by following this practice, there are certain demerits that can cause adverse effects. Having family members on a work trip can cause disturbance at crucial times. In other words, they may cause humiliation by attending unauthorized meetings and official parties. Additionally, family may not enjoy accompanying the concerned person to these trips as he/she is bound to work, instead of having a gala time with his/her loved ones. This in turn, can have a detrimental impact on their relationship, which sometime leads to life changing decisions. One such example of this is of my uncle and his family. Because of his regular meetings, he had to take his family along with him. This actually backfired and became the root cause of their divorce. Furthermore, these trips are generally known to be short in nature, hence proving to be nothing but a waste of time for other family members.
To conclude, no one can deny the fact that there has been a surge wherein business trips are not limited merely to business these days. People are known to take advantage of these trips by on boarding their family members as this not only provides them with extra family time, but also helps in providing exposure to the upcoming generation, making them experienced enough to take on larger roles. Having said that, disadvantages like disturbing effect on relationship, as well as, work related disturbance, are going to exist side by side.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ing their children to take bigger roles in future. However, numerous drawbacks including ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'enable'.
Suggestion: enable
...uld be the one taking over. These trips enables them to gain interest in business, alon...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 818, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oot cause of their divorce. Furthermore, these trips are generally known to be sh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 24.0651302605 224% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 41.998997996 183% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2510.0 1615.20841683 155% => OK
No of words: 488.0 315.596192385 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14344262295 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69698289628 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 176.041082164 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512295081967 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 809.1 506.74238477 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8228633093 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.583333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310023717909 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873865268813 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664262772178 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202179131725 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387179478488 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.