Nowadays, a lot of children are using mobile phones. Many say it is good. Some say it is bad. What is your opinion?

Essay topics:

Nowadays, a lot of children are using mobile phones. Many say it is good. Some say it is bad. What is your opinion?

Cellphones are becoming increasingly popular among youngsters every day. Whether it is a positive trend or a negative one has long been controversial. While some people believe that it is beneficial to a child to possess a mobile phone, it is argued by others that it brings more negative impact than positive. This essay will analyze both sides of argument before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.

On the one hand, those who argue in favor of giving young people cellphones claim that it is crucial for several reasons. First, a mobile phone is the quickest mean of communication. For instance, if a child encounters a difficulty or a problem, he can easily reach his parents by using his cellphone. Second, recently mobile phones have been developed. In other words, now a mobile phone is not only used for making calls, but also it consists of games, books, as well as some applications that are educative for children, therefore, they are also considered entertaining devices. That makes it clear why giving children mobile phones has garnered support.

On the other hand, despite these reasons, opponents of the usage of mobile phones by children have stronger argument. Primarily, mobile phones may entice children to spend more time in playing than in studying due to the games on it. Another reason is that the unsupervised access to the internet on mobile phones has serious drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as well as, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 232.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05172413793 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74647109001 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2148061836 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1538461538 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8461538462 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121141616398 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436341208394 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337933048569 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809021887019 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311892982173 0.056905535591 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.