Slowly and gradually mobile phones are becoming an indispensable part of human lives. As a result, a lot of children are also routinely exposed to cell phones in early phase of their childhood. While some people believe that these phones have an adverse effect on children, others think they are imperative in upbringing of children. They essay shall delve into both the viewpoints and will explain why the idea of providing smart phones to children is preposterous.
It is a growing trend in a lot of developed countries to use smart phones as a tool to develop skills in children. Parents generally allow their children to play educational games on their smart phones as they hope that it will enhance skills in their children. For instance, there are numerous applications which support learning abilities in children including BYJUs, pariksha and learnplay to name but a few. For these reasons, parents are willing to provide their children with the best resources they have at their expense. Therefore, it won't be irrational to ignore the benefits a smart phone can have on children's growth.
Conversely, though mobile phones might look like the perfect alternative for any recreational activity that children can pursue, it has its own shortcomings. As children have access to an infinite pool of free downloadable applications on these cell phones, they generally end up involving themselves in something useless. As an illustration, 80% of children in India aged between 8-15 who have access to smart phones end up spending most of their time on social networking sites such as facebook, instagram and whatsapp instead of the learning applications. Furthermore, it has a detrimental effect on their vision and they end up wearing spectacles at a very young age. Hence, parents should encourage their children to participate in outdoor activities which will help them become socially and physically active.
To conclude, although smart phones might seem a great asset to develop skillful children, it is instead a superficially attractive concept that will end up having harmful repercussions on children's growth. In my opinion, children should refrain themselves from using these cell phones and rather indulge them in fruitful outdoor activities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, furthermore, hence, look, so, therefore, while, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29166666667 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8939472275 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2260304592 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0625 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126064833497 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513837452571 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288995405174 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903019861996 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151428033793 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.