Nowadays more and more older people who are looking for work have to compete with younger people for the same jobs. What problem does this cause? What are the possible solutions?
It is undeniable true that the job markets has been witnessing an imbalance between young and old job seekers. This scenario leads to an increasing number of experienced people competing with fresh graduates for the same employment. This essay will explore the negative effects caused by this situation with some suggestions to alleviate the potential problems.
To commence with, there are several issues among elder job seekers who have to compete with younger workforce. Especially when there is an era of technology advancement. Fresher candidates are well-equipped with the knowledge of the latest modern machinery whereas old workers are familiar with only few traditional working skills. For example, nowadays in manufacturing industry there is quite common use of new machinery like CNC and VMC. However, these machines can be very tough to operate for old people who are the unaware of these modern changes which can affect the efficiency of the firm. Moreover, young workers can be hired at very low wages which is becoming difficult for the experienced employers to resist in this competition of job seeking.
On the other hand, to address the problem one of the most effective solutions would be to increase the job vacancies which could benefit both generations. Secondly, governments should encourage self-employment for the fresh graduates, so that young people can get employment. For instance, in countries like China authorities provide policies and schemes that would assist young individuals to open its own business. Besides this, administration should guarantee pension schemes in all private and government sectors for elderly people.
To conclude, although competition between both age groups will continue to be more intense, however some steps at the government and individual level can help to lessen the severity of the situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ike CNC and VMC. However, these machines can be very tough to operate for old peo...
^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s at the government and individual level can help to lessen the severity of the s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46366782007 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88565133598 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626297577855 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4948975586 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.785714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284393743861 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863093989309 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562714625121 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147348680756 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697580195779 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.