Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cellphone and safety cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.
Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Technology has successfully touched wider aspects of human life, knowingly or unknowingly. These days, people are being constantly watched over by gadgets like CCTV cameras or are easily located through GPS system. Most of the times they are ignorant of the above mentioned fact. In my opinion, this notion is certainly more advantageous as it helps in the decline of crime rate as compared to its disadvantages which carries the reason of hampering individual’s privacy and may end up bringing more cases of cyber crime.
Talking about positives first, installation of safety devices like security cameras on streets or lanes, and fixation of tracking devices in cars or vehicles have instilled a sense of fear of being caught by authorities in individuals. This not only has helped the police to catch up over criminals, but has also reduced the incidences of felony. To exemplify, a survey conducted by patrolling department revealed an 8% decrease in theft cases after installation of tracing devices in north-west region of Delhi. Consequently, it has secured the life of working women. Henceforth, proving to be meritorious, the newer surveillance schemes have somehow brought social security in people, which in itself is an important aspect of national development.
Coming to the drawbacks, the influx in this automation era, which consists of readily available information and ideas all over the internet, has given birth to a different kind of atrocity, that is cyber crime, which did not existed in yester years. Mischievous minds have paved a smarter way of committing unlawful acts through hacking into tracking and recording systems. Additionally, these devices have damaged the private life of citizens. They no longer feel good in showing in showing emotions or engaging freely in activities in public places. To illustrate, a small town in Venice has questioned their regime over the putting up of additional cameras in public gardens and theatres, which in turn has made them uncomfortable with respect to their privacy. As a result, natives found themselves more stressed instead of relaxed in such tourist attractions.
In conclusion, a constant check over man with the help of automated devices like cellphones have surged more as compare to in past. It definitely has proved to be of much help in bringing down the criminal records and making nations a safer place to love in than any number of disadvantages. Yet, countrymen challenge the government over disruptions in their privacy and eventually being bait to internet crime.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 471, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'in showing'.
Suggestion: in showing
...e of citizens. They no longer feel good in showing in showing emotions or engaging freely in activiti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 110, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...evices like cellphones have surged more as compare to in past. It definitely has p...
^^
Line 13, column 124, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...llphones have surged more as compare to in past. It definitely has proved to be of much...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, so, still, in conclusion, kind of, talking about, as a result, in my opinion, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 85.0 41.998997996 202% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2167.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 409.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29828850856 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96105887016 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616136919315 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1917973576 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.388888889 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7222222222 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100862537219 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.027708760237 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339230411642 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0629785344827 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286852442312 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.