Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.
Why do you think this is happening?
What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
In recent times, the amount of garbage being produced has increased substantially. This essay will explain what I think are the main causes for this and provide possible solutions for a government to mitigate the amount of waste generated.
With regards to the cardinal issue of inflation in debris, an important one to consider is the purchasing behaviour of the individuals. This is because people often prefer to buy vegetables and other commodities in bulk, which after a while reaches the expiry date due to non-usage. As a result, it goes into the dustbin. The possible alternative to this problem is that government needs to run awareness camps to educate individuals about drawbacks of higher quantities being purchased, so that only the required quantity is procured. Thereby, ensuring the wastage is controlled from the grass root level.
Another major cause is the industrial waste. With the number of industries multiplying rapidly, the amount of wastage churning out is also rising. The primary factor why industries are increasing is linked to the demand and supply in the market. Referring the idea mentioned above, when citizens are buying more than requirement, then the artificial demand is created in the market. As a result, production at factory level rises and eventually leads to wastage of the products. The government should regulate the factories and ensure there is no overproduction which results in product wastage. By doing so, at least only the necessary products reach the outlets while the wastage is minimized.
In conclusion, in my perspective, purchasing patterns and industrial product waste are causing high wastes. The measures of educating buyers about the necessary quantities to be purchased and industrial production regulations will help to counter the problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, at least, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36842105263 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91074996761 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610526315789 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9370451213 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.625 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127041772906 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0333022651102 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389576470217 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0755119801706 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619014409777 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.