In modern era, watching professional person on tv and magazine has become popular. People come to know about the changing trends, lifestyle and they try to adopt the same. Let us discuss the reason why it is not a positive factor to inherent the famous celebrity culture.
There are plethora of reasons to adopt celebrity lifestyle and culture. Firstly, people watch advertisement of professional player and get convinced to maintain the fitnes standard. Many children try to play like
“The Sachin Tendulkar” by joining academy coaching classes and get motivated to maintain there lifestyle. Secondly watching celebrity advertisement for the good cause like “The Amitabh Bachan”, the children as well as parents watch it and get convinced for a social motive. Additional, there are number of articles in magazines for improving english communication skills, vocabulary and motivational stories which motivates them.
However it has many negative impact on the kids and society. People take tv stars as there motivational factor. They try to do same things which they watch on Tv. For example "The Katrina Kaif" advertised for an Iphone, children started forcing there parents to purchase phone. Resulting wastage of money and effecting pocket. Additionally stunts performed in movie like “Dhoom”, children are getting idea of bank robberies. Last year, many incidents were reported of robbery.
To conclude, watching TV has many benefits but it's negative effects cannot be ignored. Kids should be checked and counselling should be done regularly by the parents and teachers, avoiding them to follow a wrong path.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nal person on tv and magazine has become popular. People come to know about the c...
^^
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...now about the changing trends, lifestyle and they try to adopt the same. Let us d...
^^
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrity'.
Suggestion: celebrity
...s not a positive factor to inherent the famous celebrity culture. There are plethora of reaso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ional stories which motivates them. However it has many negative impact on the kids...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s there motivational factor. They try to do same things which they watch on Tv. F...
^^
Line 6, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...For example 'The Katrina Kaif' advertised for an Iphone, children start...
^^
Line 6, column 340, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
... wastage of money and effecting pocket. Additionally stunts performed in movie like “Dhoom”,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... stunts performed in movie like “Dhoom”, children are getting idea of bank robber...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50592885375 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.838632702 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616600790514 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2944835904 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0625 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8125 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139032682224 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417117650021 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032163028559 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772297860485 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455643653044 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.