In a modern era, watching a professional person on tv and magazine has become popular. People came to know about the changing trends, lifestyle and try to adopt the same. Let us discuss the reason why it is not a positive factor to inherent the famous celebrity culture.
There are a plethora of reasons to adopt a celebrity lifestyle and culture. Firstly, people watch an advertisement of professional player and were convinced to maintain the fitness standard. Many children try to play like
“The Sachin Tendulkar” by joining academy coaching classes and got motivated to maintain their lifestyle. Secondly, watching celebrity advertisement for the good cause like “The Amitabh Bachan”, the children as well as parents watch it and get convinced for a social motive. Additional, there is a number of articles in magazines for improving english communication skills, vocabulary and motivational stories which motivates them.
However, it has many negative impacts on the kids and society. People take tv stars as there motivational factor. They try to do the same things which they watch in television. For example, "The Katrina Kaif" advertised for an IPhone, children started forcing their parents to purchase the phone. Resulting wastage of money and effecting pocket. As well as stunts performed in the movie “Dhoom”, children are concieving ideas of bank robbery. Last year, many incidents were reported regarding bank robberies.
To conclude, watching TV has many benefits but its negative effects cannot be ignored. Kids should be checked and counseling should be done regularly by the parents and teachers, avoiding them to follow the wrong path.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrity'.
Suggestion: celebrity
...s not a positive factor to inherent the famous celebrity culture. There are a plethora of rea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h they watch in television. For example, 'The Katrina Kaif' advertised ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42205323194 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88250546819 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600760456274 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.451323185 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8823529412 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4705882353 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134537454835 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391074750607 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329435399443 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749355627969 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048037090277 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.