Organized tour to remote communities and other countries is becoming increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge

Essay topics:

Organized tour to remote communities and other countries is becoming increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

In recent times touring companies have become much more eminent than ever in the past. Arranging tours to other countries as well as to distant areas. The trend has pros as well as cons associated to it. In the following lines, I will be discussing the same with few examples.

Primarily, organised tours to common tourist attractions and newly explored distant areas is a prevailing trend in developed as well as in developing countries. In my view this approach to tourism has come leaps and bounds as it is safer and secure way to tourism, which provides better expedition opportunities to the travelers. The increase in tourism to remotest of areas is a prime example to show the merits of this change. For instance if we see Pakistan only have seen around 300 % increase in its tourism. The turn around has a lot to do with these new tour operators, areas such as Kund Malir (newly explored hill station in the province of sindh) is a big example. This shift from conventional tourism has also provided great employment opportunities to the local inhabitants of these areas. Places like small villages of Khyber Pakhtunkhua province are also good to mention here, as this arrangement has provided good opportunities to the locals of these areas, these tour operators are somewhat dependent on them as the know their areas better than anyone else.

On the contrary, this new paradigm shift does not come without demerits. For example, on one side of the coin we see good employment opportunities for locals. However, at the same time the local are being exploited by these tour operators as they are employing them on a wage which is quite lower than they used to make while engages in guided tours previously. This causes a lot of unemployment to these local people. If we look at a practical example, in a lot of northern parts of Pakistan locals do complaint about this exploitation and they also stand with the argument that previously tourists used to contact them directly instead of coming through these touring companies. This resorts to their dissatisfaction.

To conclude, tour operators have opened great avenues and made tourism much more secure for everyone. While it also creates plethora of employment opportunities for locals.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1027, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ators are somewhat dependent on them as the know their areas better than anyone else. ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, in my view, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96031746032 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76869903297 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526455026455 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8627817171 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6842105263 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8947368421 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127994675003 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442654186825 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349742470423 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854030193018 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00834612051413 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.