Paying all workers the same salary in a company promotes harmony and respect amongst colleagues.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a notion that same pay scale for all employees in an organization promotes harmony and respect. This essay will discuss why I completely disagree with this perception.
To embark on, the cardinal merit of having equal salary at all levels is that it eradicates inequality of income. Although the discrimination based on income level will be eliminated, it also promotes togetherness among the workers. In contrast, higher income to a team member at same designation creates professional ego which is not good for work environment. As a result of paying all workers same salary, the motivation to perform can be standardized.
From my perspective, I strongly disagree with this perception because it de-motivates high performing professionals and high cadre professionals demand more pay. With regards to the former, when a good quality performance is not rewarded financially, it creates a sense of resentment in the employee towards work. As for higher designation, there are few designations such as chief manager and executive directors, which demand more presence both physically and mentally as the risk of decision-making with respect to business performance is substantially greater. For instance, executive director of a division handles more responsibility compared to any other professional in the organization, so it is justified to pay such personnel more salary. By virtue of this, it has to be remembered that skilled talent comes at a superior cost.
In conclusion, while same pay mitigates inequality of income, in my point of view, it demoralizes high performing work-horses and there will not be any substantive value for top-level management.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, as for, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4367816092 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3334126031 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605363984674 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9182665297 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151361603275 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627302871228 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729816572163 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108856215418 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663209582105 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.