People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
As the development of technologies in producing, consumers these days are able to buy low-priced products. Obviously, this has both drawbacks and benefits. However, I incline to believe that there are more disadvantages than advantages.
On the one hand, in a comparative market the first beneficiary is consumers. As the price of products such as appliances and food is coming down gradually. Consumers can save more money and reduce their living expenses. Thus, they have more money to invest or spend on their hobbies. In addition, due to the prevalence of inexpensive products, people easily purchase convenient machines as washing machine or refrigerator, help them to have a comfortable lives
On the other hand, price always goes along with the quality. Manufacturer is solely aiming to meet the colossal demand rather than to produce the high-quality products. For instance, the average age of new smartphones are 2 year less than an older one that manufactured 10 years ago. Moreover, in most of industries, chemical and artificial substances are exploited thoroughly for sake of efficient and profit. It lead to the pollution of globe that we have to face at the moment. By abusing chemical substances, human has broken the balance of ecosystem.
In conclusion, although people nowadays take advantage of cheaper products, the long-term consequence would be taken into account more seriously. In my opinion, I admit that product have to be balance between prices and quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the industries') or simply say ''most industries''.
Suggestion: most of the industries; most industries
...manufactured 10 years ago. Moreover, in most of industries, chemical and artificial substances are...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...ly for sake of efficient and profit. It lead to the pollution of globe that we have ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 237.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29113924051 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0226288458 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3320588056 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106071432368 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0281017186462 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035085563647 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.064572196603 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450674837792 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.