A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
Over the decades, materialisation around the world has begot seismic shift on people's mindset. Alongside the changing need in modern society, the latest socioeconomic discoveries have casted light on worth of individual is shadow of what he owns in terms of financial figures. I strongly agree with notion. This essay will use examples to explore reasons of direct proportion of persons worth with social status.
To begin with, high profile is intuitively perceived as the indicator of person' worth which is the only thing he strives for throughout his life. According to recent empirical research by Human Development Index indicators established that quality of life is only derived from admirable salary and material possession of a person. Admittedly, other social factors such as honesty, loyalty and kindness are not part of this consideration. Consistent with this line of thinking, it is broadly believed that status of individual is the sole way to measure his worth.
Another insight that must not be neglected, meanwhile, is since the child born; parents, teachers and entire surrounding foster child to focus on materialistic things like education, career and job. Nobody emphasis on need of soft skills such as honesty, respect, care and courage to develop as a good human. In an interview with business tycoon; chairman of Ali Baba group, Jack Ma who is also the richest man of China conveyed that; entire his life he was taught that status is brought with heavy bank statement nor with values. When he was an ordinary man with core values only, no one knew him but he became limelight once he got status. Seen in this light, it is undeniable that traditional values are fading and society are moving towards attainment of materialistic goals.
To conclude, there are ample evidences that person worth is depending upon social status and materialistic possession, whereas other values are vanishing by the time. It is predicted that if such circumstances will be followed by next generation, the values will disappear in foreseeable future and world will turn into crown of power.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...nd the world has begot seismic shift on peoples mindset. Alongside the changing need in...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'strives'.
Suggestion: strives
...person worth which is the only thing he strive for throughout his life. According to r...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: When
...th heavy bank statement nor with values.When he was a normal person with core values...
^^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...e are ample evidences that person worth is depending upon social status and materialistic po...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, whereas, while, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18235294118 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80190246787 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635294117647 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4807782562 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.857142857 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205857788881 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680271922062 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450589054084 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120703208707 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297560538807 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.