Plastic shopping bag contributes to the pollution of land and sea, some people think they should be banned. Do you agree or disagree?
Pollution is a significant issue in society. Plastic bags play a vital role in pollution maximization on land and ocean. I believe the plastic bag ought to be banned entirely because they are of the major reason behind pollution on the earth.
There is numerous point which reflects why plastic bags need to ban?
Firstly, plastic bags are hazardous to humankind. Many people use a plastic bag to store food items whereas without knowing that they are made of a dangerous chemical such as polyethylene. Due to which people health are deteriorating and they are getting ill. For example, research sh that toxic substances are found in plastic bags which goes into food and make it contaminated. Consequently, people suffer from health issues such as food poisoning and various digestion issues. Also, Plastic bags are non-biodegradable, as a result, they remain on this earth for a long time. Because they cannot be recycled that why they are thrown into the river. However, this is the reason for water impurification and disease occurring from it.
On the other hand plastic bags on affected human life, it has effected on Maire life too. When plastic bags are dumped into the river, fishes and other mammals swallow them as a portion of food, and they get ill. Moreover, their lives are put into danger also declining the water quality for them. For example, data shows that every year many water spices die and get sick because of throwing plastic bags in the rivers without considering the importance of their lives. It is necessary to stop the production of plastic bags as if it continues then the pollution on land and ocean could never be controlled.
In conclusion, plastic bags are increasing the pollution on land and sea, whereas the government, as well as individuals, need to take the responsibility to overcome this problem and make earth pollution free. So that all the humans and other spices would live their life peacefully.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 612, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd and ocean could never be controlled. In conclusion, plastic bags are increasi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95731707317 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70816840054 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524390243902 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.792020294 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5789473684 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2631578947 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57894736842 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274693332376 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094519335173 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612034830273 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165701547532 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054176563665 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.