Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea. Some people think they should be banned. Do you agree or disagree?
It is a fact that use of plastic bags has harmful effects on the ecosystem and is contributing to global warming. Many people often argue that the polyethylene shopping products should be banned to reduce the damage done to the environment. This essay agrees with the argument and will discuss the opinion in detail.
To begin with, the most important factor to stop the usage of plastic products can be attributed to the decrease in number of sea animals. This happens because at times plastic wastes are dumped in sea water, and then the aquatic animals consume them, which leads to their death. For instance, recently a dead whale was found on the coast of Philippines and upon inspection researchers concluded that 40 kgs of plastic was present in the stomach of the mammal. Moreover, plastic is non-biodegradable and hence they cannot perish easily. These implications makes plastic a threat to marine life.
Furthermore, the pollution caused to the landfills proves to be a strong reason for banning the havoc of plastic bags. The increased utilisation of the material is leading to contamination of soil and ground water. Water, being such a crucial element for human survival, will no longer be fit for consumption if not protected from the detrimental effects of plastic. In addition, the plastic bags available in shopping stores are manufactured from chemicals that upon inflammation might affect the atmosphere and could add impurities to the surroundings. For example, plastic has a substance PVC which when burned, emits toxic chemicals.
In conclusion, the life wrenching effects of plastic on the land and sea, such as death of marine animals and devastation of soil and water, justifies why many people are against the usage of these products. Therefore, making it clear that banning the products could protect the ecosystem for better sustainability in the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and will discuss the opinion in detail. To begin with, the most important factor...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'make'.
Suggestion: make
...annot perish easily. These implications makes plastic a threat to marine life. Fur...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15960912052 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86079913929 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583061889251 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6199744512 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235881989854 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070886911055 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435697595556 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138155433732 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399462622926 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.