A poor infrastructure hinders under-developed countries from progressing and modernizing. Some people think that this should be the first problem tackled by foreign aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
The paucity of resources such as financial aid and development plan are hindering the infrastructure constructions in many of the poor countries. While few individuals feel this should be the fundamental problem solved by foreign investment, this essay will explain why I completely agree with this notion.
To embark on, the cardinal focus of infrastructure development needs to begin with construction of roads. This is because they connect major cities with nearby suburbs and countryside. For instance, if there are good roadways, it will be easy to commute. As a result, trade such as cargo will grow rapidly; generating employment and consistent revenue. Furthermore, there should be more of multi-purpose buildings in major towns and cities. The primary advantages of such buildings are that it creates opportunities to run local businesses or invite global brands to start their franchises, provide leisure and entertainment facilities.
Another pivotal basic structure in any under-developed or developing economies is public transport. This is important because the majority of population in these countries are financially poor. As a consequence, they can not afford to own a private vehicle. Therefore, government should attract foreign direct investments to construct and operate transport systems like metro rail, trams, and tubes in collaboration with central government. Moreover, to a certain extent, foreign investments should be permitted in real estate for construction of basic housing, which improves the quality of life index of a country.
In conclusion, from my perspective, foreign capital should be encouraged in poor countries for development of infrastructure such as road ways, multi-utility buildings, public transportation - by investing in metros and trams, and to a possible limit in real estate as well. Due to this, a country's infrastructure can be enhanced to improve overall standard of living.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67010309278 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33797840483 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625429553265 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.101858308 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262261894307 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784205518513 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592189442529 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169924313281 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680280733047 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.