"Prevention is better than cure."
Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Nowadays, most of the countries spend majority of their funds on health education and also in taking preventive actions, since prevention is better than cure. While some people argue that disadvantages overweigh the arguments, on my point of view I strongly believe in preventive measures.
First and foremost, health education will make awareness on physical and mental fitness of the individuals. For instance, if health education is given at their early childhood, they will get to know about the importance of food pyramid. This move will also encourage them on engage in different extra curricular activities together with sports and physical training. Secondly, physical fitness is directly connected with mental fitness and it will improve the efficiency and effectiveness of individuals, while positively affecting the national income and development as well.
On the other hand, spending on preventive measures would reduce the risk of accidents and it will save lot of money and lives as well. These initiatives would reduce the number of deaths while increasing the life expectancy of the citizens. In fact, health education would decrease the absenteeism in both organizations and schools. The government expenditure on treating diseases such as diabetes, high pressure, and cholestarole will be decrease in the long run.
In conclusion, it is recommended to decide the proportion spent on each segment by the government, irrespective of the changes of the government policies. In order to achieve these goals, governments have to train people and also provide sufficient resources to the schools and relevant authorities. Apart from that, governments also have to maintain their budgets to satisy other requirements such as infrastructure, higher education, research and development in order to achieve sustainable growth of their particular continet.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62897526502 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07673426675 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593639575972 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5707616396 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.538461538 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179707056455 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605503261849 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696055737942 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109623826901 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825704716614 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.