In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes which have occured? Do you think these changes are positive or negative?
Undoubtedly, Family holds a momentous place in every individual life. However, with the advent of urbanisation, family structure and roles of the member have changed in the past years. This essay will discuss the multifarious changes and argue why I surmise this aforementioned changes are negative.
To commence with, In our contemporary society, the size of the members in family has reduced and advances towards becoming nuclear families now. This is because, Youngsters in quest of jobs along with augmenting income, decided to live in big cities leaving their parents alone behind. For instance, Multitude of youngsters left their extended families to pursue their professional life in urban cities like london, Toronto. In addition to this, Women's become the new breadwinners of the family leaving the traditional belief behind that ' A woman place is in the house', moreover, more males are willing to share household chores with their partner and even take on the part of househusband. The family reformations and changing roles of the family members are mainly occurred with the advent of globalisation.
Albeit, it should not be forgotten that aforementioned changes have also some drawbacks associated with it. Firstly, the unrelenting make-up of short families left plethora of old parents stranded. Secondly, there is a considerable surge in prices of properties, flats and construction materials stemmed from the bombardment of the smaller families in urban areas. For example, its become impossible for people, especially less well-off, to buy house in London due to propulsion of nuclear households. Furthermore, I am afraid that infants never able to emphasize love of their grandparents if this trend grows further in future.
Hammering the final nail, I pen down by saying that there are important changes happened in modern world in both structure and family roles and I would argue that these changes are not desirable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aving the traditional belief behind that A woman place is in the house, moreover,...
^^
Line 5, column 620, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...randparents if this trend grows further in future. Hammering the final nail, I pen dow...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, i am afraid
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38360655738 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91454940364 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609836065574 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2870370181 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.285714286 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267385831057 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977611220038 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844457141414 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181670005035 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585477360176 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.