It is an obvious truth that technology has had a significant effect on our daily life and no body can neglect the importance of that. While people in the past strongly believed, it is farfetched to have different robots instead of human for variety of functions.
Since, we are living in 21 century and nothing is impossible, people are more and more in contact with technology rather than humans. For example, the rate of using numerous kinds of dictionaries have been increasing among ordinary people. As a matter of fact, people are more inclined to utilize these applications because of being more fast and more accessible in comparison to humans.
In addition, these technologies have brought a huge number of benefit in economic as well. As every body knows for having your text translated by humans you must pay more and it can be so costly. So, some people can not afford it and using computers seems more preferable in their sight of view.
However, it appears so beneficial, disadvantages of that are inevitable. The most important thing that can be mentioned related to demerits is about not being able to transfer feelings of people during communicationes. But it is not for sure because nothing is clear in the future. In other words, we may have some robots full of emotions in the future.
In conclusion, adapt on the above_mentioned points, I tend to be in favour of technology and everything which is related to that such as dictionaries and so forth so on because it seems more beneficial. Unless we use technologies, we will waste not only our time but our fortune will be in danger.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'nobody'?
Suggestion: nobody
...ignificant effect on our daily life and no body can neglect the importance of that. Whi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... robots full of emotions in the future. In conclusion, adapt on the above_mentio...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83032490975 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8643655809 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56678700361 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2554007237 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5714285714 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0387304731495 0.244688304435 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.013654030369 0.084324248473 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240907079376 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0226480164112 0.151304729494 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019843968702 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.