School and university students learn lessons far better from their teachers than from other sources, such as the Internet and television. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that teachers are the prime source of education for primary school and university students, and they reap the best knowledge at educational institutions rather than other methods such as world-wide-web and television. I agree with this notion to a certain extent because human interaction plays a vital role in learning. However, technology has become an indispensable part of the study for several reasons.
To embark upon, undeniably, a person attains real-life expertise from the teachers as being experienced individuals, they can make their pupils understand crucial lessons with ease by giving real-life examples. Moreover, when it comes to learning, every person has a different cognitive level. So a professor can teach every student according to their level of digesting knowledge which a machine or internet can not do. Not to mention that study at the school is two-way communication where a learner can ask questions to clear their doubts, While it is impossible in the case of technologies. For instance, if cyber-space and television are the best teachers, most of the people in this world would be well educated.
On the other hand, the internet has proved to be a boon for students as it is a sea of information. Although they can not obtain comprehensive knowledge from the world-wide-web, there are myriad of websites and videos available online that assist them for preparing college projects as well as exams. Not only this but also children learn several real-life lessons from the television reality shows and start observing various thinks from a very young age. To cite an example here, these days, there are many television shows that are specially designed for children learning.
To conclude, despite the fact that the internet and television keep students abreast of numerous useful information and are the source of various topics, the significance of human communication is invincible for grasping lessons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...achers as being experienced individuals, they can make their pupils understand cr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36334405145 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9697558414 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594855305466 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3435397527 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.307692308 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214349781067 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624276474374 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532680843123 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11239713894 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391555396043 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.