School teachers are more responsible for the social and intellectual development of students than parents.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that teachers have more responsibility for the cognitive as well as social progress of students. I completely agree with that statement because school is the best place to socialize and also the teachers are well trained to uplift academic skills of the students.
It is the duty of the school officials to enhance the social aspect of the student because school is the most appropriate place for socialization. A student gets to interact with not only their peers but also with various experts at a seminar, presentation program conducted by the school. This opportunity helps students to become affable and cope with different members of the society. For example, research by the University of Cambridge showed that more than 80% of the children of Bridgetown have learned the communication skills from their teachers.
Apart from boosting the social aspects of students, teachers are also obligated to improve the academic level of students because they are well trained for that particular task. A teacher, prior to starting their career, undergoes extensive training programs, apprenticeships about effective teaching. This enables them to deal with various intellects of children effectively, which would rather be impossible to be done by parents at home. For instance, a study conducted by School Association of Nepal shows that children are only able to understand to a minimal amount when taught by their parents whereas they grab more knowledge when their mentors teach.
In conclusion, teachers are the best to uplift the social and academic level of a student as they are well trained and also well equipped for that task.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and also well equipped for that task.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, whereas, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23220973783 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79956972625 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516853932584 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4521806783 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226628210039 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095698708572 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060829202538 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155394420733 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422199490344 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.