Science can now offer people a life expectancy of close to one hundred years or even more. Some people view it in a positive light, but others believe it creates some problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
he rapid advances in science and technology have made possible in the extension of the lifespan of human beings. While some persons deem it advantageous, others are worried about the negative consequences that it could bring in. From my perspective, I support the former notion.
The increase in life expectancy means there is going to be rocketing progress in the field of science and technology. In other words, the rate of advancement in scientific discoveries and inventions will increase dramatically in the coming decades. This is because all the current scientists can live longer and can, therefore, use their skills, talents, and experience for a long period, which can result in the more fascinating inventions than what we are witnessing now. For instance, if Einstien had not died in his 40s, he would have certainly discovered the mystery of this universe by his 100s.
Nonetheless, some people are concerned about the detrimental effects of increment in life span. Their main worry is about the impact of this on the environment. The logic behind is that longer life expectancy increases the population by fivefold within a decade; consequently, this would create chaos everywhere on the planet. For example, there would be traffic congestion everywhere; moreover, rising vehicle number would emit more greenhouse gases which would further contribute in worsening the issues of global warming. This nightmare scenario would definitely convert our planet into lifeless.
In conclusion, notwithstanding the concern of some people who think that increasing the living period of human would bring chaos on the earth, I believe that it brings good opportunity for the rapid advancements in the field of science and technology as researchers, engineers and scientists can use their expertise for a longer period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he rapid advances in science and technolog...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mystery of this universe by his 100s. Nonetheless, some people are concerned a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37630662021 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.957237918 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606271777003 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.4072433962 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.692307692 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1444090816 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048282822647 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472460181479 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859395197555 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0138576668469 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.