Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that scientific analysis need to be conducted and authorised by the government than the private organisations. I wholeheartedly agree with the argument because of the security reasons and profit-oriented approach of private alliances.
Conducting scientific research is a product of paradigm shift in the development of any nation and both necessary and novelty are essential. Thus, it should be managed and controlled by the government as such research sometimes involves high-risk additionally many resources have been implanted to make it successful. If it goes to any private companies there are chances that confidentiality diminishes. For example, even the number of studies shown that the times the nuclear energy installation, plant given in private hands there is a chance 70%, of information will leak and will be misused by many.
The other persuasive reason is that these organizations are profit-oriented and not for the public welfare. In other words, they do not care about the negative consequences of experiments on the environment and community. The experiment on developing fossil fuels such as gas, for instance, can release hazardous wastes and these wastes cause many dangerous effects on the environment in the long-term, but these sources can bring the huge profit for the company in the short time, so many private enterprises would still invest in this research, no matter how it can destroy the environment. Therefore, if it is carried by the government that will consider all the aspects before making decisions.
In conclusion, it is important to have researches to be conducted under the supervision of the administration since it will maintain confidentiality so that it cannot be misused or come into the wrong hand.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e been implanted to make it successful. If it goes to any private companies there ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37634408602 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23473475694 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591397849462 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.4191356764 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.363636364 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252414671941 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878715912579 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581431939145 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144232428285 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059988396975 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.