shops should give preference in selling local food rather than imported food. Do you agree or disagree
To maximize their profit of food traders emphasise on sell of items that travelled long distances before reaching their selling counter, however, this is prejudice with locally produced eatables. In my opinion, I agree that retailers ought to prioritize indigenous nourishment while selling, which will help both society and individuals.
One main reason is that it improves overall social health. Nutritional value declines substantially if food products are preserved for longer periods. As a result higher percentage population of any society suffering through vitamin deficiency. Which not only causes serious health complications for individuals but also reduce overall life expectancy among these people. In order to overcome this situation One must embrace fresh eatables which are neither preserved nor travelled long distances.
Another advantage of trading indigenous nourishments locally is that it helps native dwellers with higher employment opportunities. It is obvious that if demand is surging then supply should also be in the same proportion. While this is happening it helps both individual and society by generating more jobs. As a result, a stable outlook can be witnessed from such locality. when India, for instance, was struggling for independence a movement of banning foreign goods standed - tbis undoubtedly consolidated against rulers by giving locals job.
Finally, if supermarkets, traders, and retailers boost sells of homegrown food items then capital purchase cost apparently gels reduced for such business people. This is because overhead costs such as transportation, refrigeration and handling are not attracted in its production. Consequently keeping selling price unchanged
In conclusion, bias with ethnic food products hurts social elements adversely. To avoid this first preference for local food products is must
- Nowadays cultures of different countries are becoming more similar than they used to be What are the reason Is it a positive or a negative development Give your own opinion and examples 98
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- Question: An increasing number of people are buying what they need online. What are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies to shopping online? 78
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business bring about the death of local communities.To what extent do you agree o 11
- Some people believe that children should not be given homework every day, while others believe that they must get homework every day in order to be successful at school. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ducts are preserved for longer periods. As a result higher percentage population o...
^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...ok can be witnessed from such locality. when India, for instance, was struggling for...
^^^^
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...ng are not attracted in its production. Consequently keeping selling price unchanged In ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, look, so, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83823529412 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99575032096 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691176470588 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8070243969 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.25 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168338294221 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488504747118 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581593042575 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983938765217 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530245290847 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.