Should companies which cause pollution be taxed.?
Industrial Pollution has increased all over the world, some people believe that taxing companies, which cause it, is the best way to reduce industrial pollution while some suggest that there are several other ways to solve this trouble. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
Some individuals are of the opinion that industries, which cause pollution should be taxed heavily so as to reduce
pollution, whereas others opine that pollution should be controlled by other means. This essay intends to discuss
both perspectives. I, however, side with the latter view.
Those who are in favor of taxing companies say so because it is these companies, which cause pollution and they
should pay for cleaning it up. The ordinary people should not have to pay for it through taxes. Obviously, if the government pays for it, it would be through the common man’s pocket.
On the other hand, other methods to deal with the situation would be better. This is because it would be very
difficult to judge which industries are causing how much pollution. They would all shrug off their shoulders and
that would make matters worse. Secondly, these companies would claim that they are already paying a lot of
taxes and so it becomes the governments’ responsibility.
Other methods should be used to tackle this problem. To begin with, the government can make it mandatory for
these industries to set up effluent-treatment plants. The government can also give them subsidies for such projects.
This would ensure that these effluents don’t contaminate the underground water. These industries should also
be encouraged for tree plantation. They should have green belt all around them so that the trees absorb all the
carbon dioxide liberated.
To conclude, taxing the industries would not work as a good solution for reducing pollution and other methods
should be looked into.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...cause pollution should be taxed heavily so as to reduce pollution, whereas others opine...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, as to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27868852459 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75141555515 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534426229508 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.3090683858 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7368421053 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0526315789 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 17.0 4.38176352705 388% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312346973262 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093813747334 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107346756028 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108069421153 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0993433533028 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.