Should museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public, or should a charge, even a voluntary charge be levied for admittance? What is your opinion?
It is generally argued that weather the entrance to historical buildings such as museums and art galleries must be free for local people or should impose a minimal or voluntary charge in the entry ticket. In my opinion, while I believe that the cost-free service could promote national pride; however, it is required to collect money from the general public for the maintenance of these monuments.
To begin with, specific entrance fees by people could help to preserve these buildings for the future. In other words, these ancient buildings require regular care and maintenance, which could only be possible with the renovation, that can be done with public money. If a museum contains updated services as well as things related to the past, it would lure people to visit again, and save them for years. A national museum of sports in India, for instance, has a limited ticket cost for entry. This money is used by its management, to update the facilities for the visitors, or to protect its beauty and history for the upcoming generations.
Moreover, government subsidence could not afford the salaries to workers of art galleries. As most of the historical buildings are partially aided by the administration, the funds could not help to raise salaries to its caregivers. If a compulsory entrance is imposed to the public along with some voluntary funds, everything runs smoothly as all the staff get their monthly earnings without hassle. Take the case of art galleries in Finland; they have employed a lot of employees to address the visitors with directions or as language translators. Their income is partly dependent on public money or government subsidies as the council funds are limited.
In conclusion, although the exemption of money from people to the historical monuments increases cultural and country’s dignity, yet I believe that particular entry fees from local people should be levied to admittance, just to sustain the heritage of museums and galleries,
- More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern lifestyle which cannot be treated with modern medicines Some people think that a return to traditional medicine should be encouraged To what extent do you agree 67
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times even on holidays Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages 79
- Some people believe that to protect local culture tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Some people believe that it is better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe that it is good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- You have a Facebook friend living in another country and s he is curious to learn about a major news item in your country Write a letter to your Facebook friend In your letter describe a news story in your country explain why people are interested in it s 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...t is required to collect money from the general public for the maintenance of these monuments....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d history for the upcoming generations. Moreover, government subsidence could no...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple should be levied to admittance, just to sustain the heritage of museums and g...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14860681115 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76979932218 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56346749226 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5332511071 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.923076923 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295042646411 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920543926986 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951680002242 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176651323377 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121531432617 0.056905535591 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.