Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?

Essay topics:

Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?

There is no doubt that more than 90% of the population living in poorer countries are below poverty line. I firmly believe that the wealthy nations should support the poor countries by giving aid toward things like food and literature. I will explain my support for this view in this essay.

First of all, Wealthy nations are not short of cash, and instead, they are already rich. This means that they can easily afford to donate some part of their money to the lower class of the society residing in poor countries. For example, according to a recent report published by the UK government, more than 5 million euros are donated annually towards teaching and food problems to the nations like Nigeria and Ethiopia.

Secondly, Rich countries who are the chief members of the United Nations of Council are accountable for giving grant to poor countries by donating at least 5% of their GDP. This is because of the income capacity of developed countries who produce a good amount of money above their gross domestic product. For instance, in 2016 the UK government granted a fund of 1 million dollars to Yemen citizens in order to eradicate the scarcity of food and create new schools to bring reform in the education. Therefore, it seems quite obvious that rich countries do make a significant contribution towards low-deprived nations.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is only the responsibility of rich countries to uplift the status of low-deprived nations, especially in the food and education sector.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97254901961 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67858926414 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58431372549 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9847176379 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.272727273 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1818181818 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195096141722 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693089657577 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516643062654 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111876893454 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287211145114 0.056905535591 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.