To solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?
It is undeniable that traffic has surged in recent times, and is one of the global concern which needs to be taken care of. Many of the significant cities face congestion issues during peak hours. Research shows that metro cities like Mumbai, New Delhi, Bangalore, etc., in India; the traffic problems are detrimental to the city's development. To overcome this, people opine that authorities should levy a hefty tax on private car owners and use that money to develop public transport infrastructure; the pros and cons are discussed in the further paragraphs.
Increasing the tax on private cars will decline the number of self-owned vehicles on the road. The affordability criteria will increase, resulting in less sale of the cars. Furthermore, the green-house emission will also eliminate caused due to these vehicles, thereby reducing the city's pollution. Also, road accidents will reduce. Also, public transport utilisation will increase; forcing the government to develop better infrastructure.
Nevertheless, there are lakhs of people who might get jobbles. The daily livelihood of many drivers in India is depended on driving private vehicles. Moreover, it is time-consuming to commute via public transport. Many business people prefer working during there travel time, for better productivity. The people travelling in different cities for work purpose might find it difficult to depend on public transport. As well, the safety concerns are taken into consideration, private vehicles are much better option when compared to mass transit.
To sum up, the authorities must develop the infrastructure, making it feasible for the population to use the commuting service and pursuing the masses by educating them about the benefits of using public transit.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49264705882 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95781141326 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628676470588 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.6490942876 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.375 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199648717739 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556617234807 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680970714153 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109066468922 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528221970883 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.