In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?
In developed countries, taxes which are paid by people is the significant sources of income for the government. One of the way to raise fund for infrastructure projects, particularly public transportation would be charged taxes substantially the private owned vehicle. This policy have positive and negative impacts on life of inhabitants. In this essay, I will outline both outcome if taxes charge car owners in detail.
Enhancing public transportation for inhabitants in big cities have different merits. First, if it is accessible it would reduce the cost of transportation. Own a car has lot of hidden cost in big cities and the car need to maintain properly to give a good ride. Instead using public transport is just only need to charge one card monthly or annually. For instance, in japan more people tend to use public transport because it is cheap and convenient. Besides, more people force to walk during the day. In this way, it would effect on body health. One study indicate that more Japanese are in well-shaped because they walk at least twenty minutes during the day which is incomparable with inhabitant in western society. There so, the better life style will be occurred if public transport develop.
On the other hand, there are some downside exist if government put taxes on private car owners. Firstly, the people choice for mode of transportation will be reduced. In North America, the distances are far more than other continents. So people tend to have their own cars to commute. Besides, some big family usually go to the trip by their own. Because they let them freedom to stop wherever they want. Also in some cases it is much cheaper than other mode transportation. Even if the gasoline is not chip still when the big families want to go abroad it would much more easily for them to bear the cost of vehicle instead of using airplane.
In sum, improvement in public transport would facilitate life for many inhabitants in terms of cost of living, and in the long run better physical healthcare. Unlike this merits, freedom of people to choose their own preferences will be reduced and even for some families going to the trip become impossible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
... the private owned vehicle. This policy have positive and negative impacts on life o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
... maintain properly to give a good ride. Instead using public transport is just only nee...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'walking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: walking
... convenient. Besides, more people force to walk during the day. In this way, it would e...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...k during the day. In this way, it would effect on body health. One study indicate that...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 35, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'downsides'?
Suggestion: downsides
... On the other hand, there are some downside exist if government put taxes on privat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 167, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... run better physical healthcare. Unlike this merits, freedom of people to choose the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, so, still, well, at least, for instance, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94037940379 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75562453139 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525745257453 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2425447148 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2608695652 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0434782609 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69565217391 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120516922293 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373655910744 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401196311537 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775807743566 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274141751525 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.