In some aread of the US, a curfew is imposed in which teenagers are not allowed to be out of doors after a particular time at night unless they are accompanied by an adult. What is your opinion about this?
A strict rule has been issued for certain parts of US, where teenagers are prohibited to go outside their house without any adult after particular time at night. I strongly support this rule as it would significantly decrease crime rate and would provide a sense of security.
One of the top reason to implement this curfew would be to mitigate criminal activities. Such activities are mostly executed at late hours of night and teenagers are increasingly becoming a part of it. This prevention of going out would not only restrict anyone already involve in criminal activities but also impede any new recruits for this. Without this rule, teenagers would be allowed to go out any time which would provide an opportunity to criminals for luring them in illegal actions as mostly teenagers are not old enough to take decisions maturely. Thus, restriction on teenagers going out at night would result in a drastic decrease in immoral activities.
Another compelling reason to advocate the idea of limiting hours to go out for teenagers, is that it provides security to not only their parents but also people living in that areas. First of all, it would enable parents to keep check and balance on their children by accompanying them at night. Furthermore, teenagers are mostly get victimized by kidnapping and human trafficking and with this rule parents can feel secure as they will be at home at night when most of these activities happen. In addition, people living in the area of this restriction would also feel secure as there will be less teenagers outside at night so chances of criminal activities are lower, consequently, feeling free to go out at any time of night.
To conclude, teenagers limited outgoing at night would contribute to make society safer and most importantly for parents to feel more secured of their children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'involves'.
Suggestion: involves
... would not only restrict anyone already involve in criminal activities but also impede ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 595, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun teenagers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...would also feel secure as there will be less teenagers outside at night so chances o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, thus, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99350649351 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70363129809 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525974025974 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.3612046675 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.166666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257133592664 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10757667274 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557308531401 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157882084813 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525584948469 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.