Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live. Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Since, development and fast paced era, people started to concerning about other people and even people of other countries too. Nowadays, many charity organizations are collecting more and more donation from individuals and big company and organization for betterment of the world. Some people are saying that this money should be use within the country no matter they need it or not. While remaining group of citizen are saying that we could use it not only for own country but those countries too, who are in need of it. I shall discuss both the points and at the end give my opinion on it.

Because of public awareness and help from the government, people have started to donate money recently ever before in history. Nowadays, earning scale has been increased with modern mind set to help society, human are donating some portion of their money to the charitable organization for betterment. Some people are in favor to use this charity money within the country, such as, some part of country which is affected by natural cause, use donation money for development of areas affected by flood. The reason behind this thinking of citizen is that, they want to use their money in their own country rather than it goes to other country. If there is no need for charity help within country then keep money and use it when needed. It can be seen mostly in developing country, where people do not want to use their money for others.

On the other hand of charity fund, in developed countries, they are trying to keep peace and help those who are in need. Government of many countries have enough money to help their own country for natural disaster and even they have full public support in that worse situation. At that time those country try to use their charity fund for other country to help and strengthen bonding between two countries. Even big and developed countries provide manpower to help and fight with natural problems. Helping others is our duty and makes us feel happy after all. In 2001, there was big earthquake in Kutch, Gujarat, India, at that time local people as well as other countries help those people who suffered from this natural disaster.

To sum up, I, personally say that use of charitable fund within country or for other country is depends on ability and wealth of the country. If the country is capable to use their fund for other countries then it will be beneficial for both the countries. While, within use not bad if country has enough fund.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...le are saying that this money should be use within the country no matter they need ...
^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve started to donate money recently ever before in history. Nowadays, earning sca...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, well, while, after all, such as, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2051.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 432.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74768518519 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35461957113 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460648148148 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.9 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.678110356 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.55 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285233768104 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102381985214 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430943383951 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184636264114 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635718263678 0.056905535591 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.