Some believe that people who do physical work should be paid on par with the people who have a high level degree. Do you agree or disagree?
As a matter of fact, there is a lot of illiteracy around the globe and as illiterate people are not capable of doing official work, they are provided with laborious work which requires a huge amount of physical efforts. Based on this fact, many of us believe that their wages should be equivalent to the literate people who have been assigned official work. However, the biggest question is how can the wages be measured for such people against officials’ salary and if it is even relevant to do so?
First of all, even though officials work at their offices and it may look like that they don’t have many physical activities to do but that doesn’t eradicate the fact they have to use their brains in a severe way to finish their jobs or meet given deadlines. Even if not all the jobs may require a lot of efforts but most of them are not comfortable either. Some of these jobs drain the official’s energy as well as makes them mentally tiring.
On the other hand, it cannot be said that doing a work which requires a lot of physical capacity and efforts is easier and unimportant. In fact, many such activities are required to run a country and directly impact the economics of a country. Keeping doing heavy physical work for a long time may take a huge toll on the worker’s overall health.
In essence, even though I am an agreement that officials get higher salaries in comparison to the labors I don’t agree with the above-given view as no equivalence of official’s wages and labor’s wages be done in reality. However, the government should make laws about the minimum wages and ensure that all the working people are being paid fairly according to their jobs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a severe way" with adverb for "severe"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... the fact they have to use their brains in a severe way to finish their jobs or meet given dead...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, so, well, in fact, as a matter of fact, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75503355705 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72987144371 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546979865772 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.3360400412 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.818181818 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259264852179 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102705225735 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757602697141 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160905827501 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867268101614 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.