Some children from the age of 11 or 13 go to schools to learn more practical skills that will help them get a job in some countries. Other children stay in schools that provide a more general academic education. What should schools do to prepare students for future work?
Future work is dilemma for all young teenagers to choose their major. In general, schools provide a curriculum that is based on many subjects which includes all the basic information. Some schools provide for children at the age of 11 or 13 learning of practical skills that may help them get a job in some nations, while others provide a general academic education.
First, in technical schools they provide practical subjects that are precise in a specific major. In this case, the academy should focus on the major skill of the subject chosen and give it more importance than the general ones. For example, if a child chose interior design in this type of school, he should study about its history, museums, art, how to illustrate, draw and furnish…etc. this student has to know all the information about the chosen subject. But of course, general knowledge should be included like languages and others, in order to gain extra data in a brief way. In this way, this type of school help a child to focus on the major which will build his career at a young age and may help him succeed in it if he didn’t changed his mind later on.
Moreover, in general academic schools they include a wide schedule that has a bit of many subjects. In this instance, the undergraduate can observe all the information needed and he may later on focus on one material based on his interest. For example, in Lebanon the majority of schools are based on this type of curriculum. All students choose a specific kind of major after 15 years of general knowledge given in school; in grades 10, 11 and 12 they are free to choose certain education type depending on their grades. General academic schools don’t focus on a specific major whereas it gives the child a freedom of choice. This kind of school helps the student note all basic topics in order to let himself center on what he should do with his future work.
In conclusion, practical schools should focus on giving the student all the information needed especially the on site once, in order to let them experience the type of work they’ll have later on. While the academic schools should point out briefly the wide materials needed to let the undergraduate know step by step what his interested in for his future job. In my opinion, general education is much more precise for the future, in that way the child will know his real interest after receiving many skills and will focus on his future work, rather than choosing at a young age and changing plans later on.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a brief way" with adverb for "brief"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...and others, in order to gain extra data in a brief way. In this way, this type of school help ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 739, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[4]
Message: The verb 'didn't' requires base form of this verb: 'change'
Suggestion: change
...may help him succeed in it if he didn’t changed his mind later on. Moreover, in gene...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 607, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'freedom'.
Suggestion: freedom
...ecific major whereas it gives the child a freedom of choice. This kind of school helps th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, whereas, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in general, kind of, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 443.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69525959368 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46825665524 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44920993228 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7925364802 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.555555556 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6111111111 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328206888818 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113320836343 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10660237545 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231742468305 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882323652369 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.