With the population growth, demand for building houses is increasing all over the world. Some cities lean toward constructing taller property for more space. Others prefer to build houses in bigger places. In my point of view, I think building skyscrapers is a good choice for safety and advanced life.
To begin with, finding and erecting accommodation on a wider area of land has a few downsides. Firstly, because of global warming, buildings in coastal cities have chances to be inundated. For example, in Japan or the Netherlands, there are lots of people who have to move on to other lively places because tsunamis and floods damaged their homes. Secondly, with the widening area, many people living in buildings where far away from downtown will get troubles in going to their workplaces, supermarkets, or entertainments.
By contrast, there are a host of advantages with regard to constructing taller buildings. At first, other areas of land could be built into schools, hospitals, farms, or amusement parks instead of houses. Those places boost convenience and comfortability in our life. On top of that, living in skyscrapers can escape from noises, floods, and air pollution. Watching the beauty of cities from the height and breathing in the fresh air after the wake up is phenomenal and gain more energy for the new day.
In conclusion, I believe that in the future there will be a range of skyscrapers for living because of the dramatic population growth rate and it is necessary for people to adapt it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...rtainments. By contrast, there are a host of advantages with regard to constructi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, to begin with, with regard to, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03162055336 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81156333293 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620553359684 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6181823165 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9285714286 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222220946605 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077801228351 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771207068694 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118613071667 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939860779118 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.