Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime. Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crime.
To what extent do you agree?
In the present scenario, many countries around the globe have been fighting widespread crime and bad outcomes. It is argued that recruiting more people in the police force to increase surveillance on roads is the only key to reduce or eradicate this menace. I completely agree with this viewpoint, because criminals are always fearful of armed cops on the streets, and it provides a sense of security among citizens.
To embark with, undoubtedly, law offenders all over the world always target locations where there is less scrutiny from police. Meanwhile, recruiting more officials in the law enforcement departments would allow such less monitored areas to get equal attention like others as culprits are always scared of cops carrying guns and other immediate response weapons. For instance, in the capital city of India, it is observed that snatching incidents have reduced by 75% because of the deployment of cops with Guns.
Moreover, having more police officials monitoring each and every area of a particular city provides a sense of security and the utmost safety among fellow citizens. People around the particular area can sleep peacefully keeping in mind that they are being taken care of by the professional police officers. In addition, such officers are highly trained to tackle any kind of crime or uncertainty. To illustrate, the beautiful city of Chandigarh in India is popular for its zero or very less criminal rate resulting from extreme supervision from cops around the borders of city.
In conclusion, increasing the staff in the police is the best way to handle this ever increasing crime. Besides providing satisfaction among the fellow citizens that they are protected at all times, it would increase fear among such wrongdoers and these people would be thinking twice before committing any sort of offense.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increasing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: increasing
...ruiting more people in the police force to increase surveillance on roads is the only key t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, moreover, so, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25675675676 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71928821507 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601351351351 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9393576754 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.666666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223967444409 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811089972651 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604090595546 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134933302978 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639212808902 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.