In some countries children are studying 5 hours in school, while in other countries they study longer. Shorter format of study is advantageous or disadvantageous.
Study timetables immensely vary in schools across different countries. Although longer study hours practiced by few schools in various countries has its own benefits, shorter studying formats followed by some schools in other countries are believed to be more advantageous. The virtues of such arrangement can be shown by the effects it has on a child’s over-all development, physical fitness and improved academic performances.
To commence with, an indispensable benefit of having less number of study hours in school improves the quality of development, socially and physically. For example, majority of schools in the US follow a timetable which includes extra-curricular development classes along with academic classes. As a result of which, children tend to develop themselves into prudent adults of the society. Not only lesser time for studying provides them with available time to pursue physical activities, but also deters them from being anxious. Thus, it is perhaps evident that shorter study time spurs the child’s well-being.
In addition, longer hours in study can negatively impact the academic performance of a child in a school. For instance, a recent study borne by a few scientists in Japan substantially proved that schools with more than 5 hours of study time have 48% lesser performance rates when compared with that of institutions with up-to 5 hours of study time. Hence, this example evidently states that schools must follow shorter time for study hours in order to achieve greater academic results.
In conclusion, perhaps it is distinctly clear that schools following shorter formats of study hours tend to be more fruitful in terms of over-all development of children. It is hoped that schools adopt such formats in the foreseeable future and continue to be beneficial to children and the society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39583333333 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96478170454 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552083333333 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.610649644 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.538461538 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415850451026 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158395177386 0.084324248473 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12691581211 0.0667982634062 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275061868557 0.151304729494 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849697409636 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.