In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In various nations, Limited number of people are taking huge amount of wages. Individuals believe this is for the betterment of nation. Whereas, others consider the national authority must control the salary structures of employee. In this essay, both the views will be discussed in the following paragraphs followed by an opinion.
On the one side, Intake of larger portion of countries money by limited number of individuals is profitable for the nation. These people are major contributor of GDP of country as well as helps the government in various development and industrialization steps by constructing factories in various part of the country and employing thousands of individuals. For instance, In India, business tycoon like Mr. Ratan Tata is one of the richest men in Asia and he is running 50 companies in the nation which include 10000 workers.
On the other side, government administration on wages is vital for the balance in the society between rich and poor. The income is the main purpose for a working individual to perform duties, therefore minimizing gap in money will help the people to grow in equality and biasedness will be minimum. Especially in private organization where every industry has its own salary structure, which makes the money earning process complicated and chaotic.
In conclusion, some individuals take home salary is the major portion of the nation’s capital and in return they contribute in society through various means. However, I believe balance with the community is necessary to provide every individual equal opportunity, therefore the government must limit the salary structure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e this is for the betterment of nation. Whereas, others consider the national authority...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33204633205 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97383029307 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586872586873 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5043857624 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.083333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213903027173 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753210025561 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319585452976 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127033302458 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569805734974 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.