In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In today’s world of capitalism, where the businesses and the governments pays a huge pay-slips to only few highly qualified people. As a result, certain section of society believes that such a trend is positive for national progress. Whereas, others have contrasting views suggesting the government to regulate the pay scales, in order to maintain financial equality among citizenry. In my view, for a nation to have economic progress, it is must to pay higher rewards to best performers. However, a minimum salary for all professions must be enforced by the government.
Firstly, one of the most fundamental criteria behind higher remuneration is higher qualifications. Therefore, higher qualifications means higher competition and better education which leads to increasing adult literacy rates, ultimately leading to developed nation. For example, as per recent figures released by USA’s national job market, engineers are among top 5 highest paid professions. As a result, increased proportion of younger generation are getting attracted towards this field, leading to more education nation. Secondly, higher remuneration improves global economic reputation of a nation and attracts better skilled labors from across the globe. For instance, USA attracts plethora of skilled workers from countries like India and China, as it provides extremely high average salaries.
On the other hand, this phenomenon of pay scale difference had resulted into unprecedented levels of gap between the rich and the poor. Moreover, certain people believe that such an unequal wealth distribution would lead to socially immoral model and dissatisfaction among economically backward society. More importantly, corporates and businesses exploits blue collar professionals by paying extremely meager pays.
To conclude, for a nation to prosper and gain global reputation in business, it is must to provide lucrative packages to talented professionals. However, in order to maintain a fine balance between rich and poor, public authorities must enforce strict labor laws of setting a minimum lower threshold for all the professions. This shall ensure in having fair policies for low grade professions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 448, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...nation to have economic progress, it is must to pay higher rewards to best performers. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 475, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the best'.
Suggestion: to the best
...gress, it is must to pay higher rewards to best performers. However, a minimum salary f...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'qualifications'' or 'qualification's'?
Suggestion: qualifications'; qualification's
...igher qualifications. Therefore, higher qualifications means higher competition and better edu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...in global reputation in business, it is must to provide lucrative packages to talented ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74311926606 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09217715203 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642201834862 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5672361456 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.470588235 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2352941176 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11764705882 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11545498077 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363864714576 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0253054287291 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.068579015391 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027951517492 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.