In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.

To what extent do you agree or disagree

Fast food problems, A rate is significantly measured in a high trend in several countries, should be taken the highest consideration. Individual`s health is being affected by the huge consumption of the fast food; thus, it is believed that government should to apply additional taxes on it. I would agree with this notion, but it is not the root cause solution of the problem, and there are other effective actions can be maintained.

To begin with, high taxes on fast food products can assist to reduce number of people who used to consume such food. When government apply additional charges, certain level of community won’t afford to buy it and will rely on other resources of food, such as cooking themselves at home. For example, taxes played a pivotal role to reduce the number of smokers around the world, when some government imposed huge taxes on cigarettes. By then, some diseases rate is significantly plummeted due to quitting such habit.

On contrary, the increase in taxes is one of agreed ways to control these problems of fast food, but it puts a heavy pressure on the market and some businesses. Some companies will suffer from the applied taxes and will be forced to take some mitigation measures to reduce their cost and cope with the added charges by government on their imported material. For instance, thousands of employees lost their jobs in African market due to the sudden taxes applied on some factories.

To sum up, although the taxes can be the main factor to minimize the trend of junk food consumption, other measures can be applied by government to avoid this decision side effects. Laws and regulation on food quality can be implemented and to be monitored by the concerned council.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94863013699 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77348000023 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547945205479 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5485748109 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.416666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265798357774 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103086318792 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524097371938 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160588789129 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442786146251 0.056905535591 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.