In some countries , number of people visiting art galleries is declining.What are reasons for this?How can we solve this problem?
Art is a medium to demonstrate several aspects of life such as human emotions, culture, imagination, creativity and also, the history. However, the interest of people in craft galleries is plunging, owing to the minimized interest of people in recreational activities and easy availability of everything online, through technology.
Firstly, in this competitive environment, parents are enforcing their children to concentrate more on studies and less on talent, which inevitably impacts youth to lose interest in practicing abilities. Moreover, children consider arts as a secondary source of education, hence, insignificant for their career. Secondly, the boom of technology has made everything easily available, therefore people tend to look for paintings and sculptures online rather than visiting museums or galleries. To elucidate, many people buy decorative pieces through websites, since they are cheap, as majorly they are not hand made. Besides this, they come with mostly free door-step delivery and option of return.
There can be two effective solutions to curtail this issue. One, the government should start funding art enthusiasts, until they can earn a living through their passion. Not only this will help artists economically, but also this step will encourage youth to foresee their career in arts. Another way of developing more insight of people in arts is by organizing more inter-school, state and country level art competitions for people of all age groups. Consequently, it would initiate their footsteps towards executing their skills.
To conclude, art is an amalgamation of emotions, traditions, generations, theories of a country, and must be enlivened by the government as well as people to have a prosperous future. Henceforth, artwork spurs creative ideas inside human brains and are indispensable for human progress.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63571428571 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04912165339 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664285714286 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.598206242 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.714285714 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229056976974 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688798734317 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409437197993 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121090098701 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551902056074 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.