In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with
other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes
the government has to pay for this care.
Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The trend of senior citizens living in an old age home is inflating. A matter of concern is who should bear the expenses of aging people? In my opinion, it should be the obligation of the children to provide monetary funds, to support their parents, but if they are not economically strong, they could seek government aid.
It is the moral duty of the adult children to provide financial resources for their elderly parents. Firstly, people should bear the expenditure of their parents out of love and gratitude. Their parents have not only raised them, but they have also made many sacrifices for them. Secondly, with increasing work pressure than ever before, parents care has become secondary, but children owe same dedication to their parents, as their parents demonstrated towards them. Otherwise, this will disparage the value of parenting. To illustrate, numerous couples are childless, as they believe that instead of spending on bringing up a child, who may abandon them in the future, they can enjoy till old age with the same amount.
Finally, children should never forget that by helping their parents, they are being exemplary to their younger generations. For Instance, the latest survey of families indicates that youngsters incorporate 60% of their thoughts from their families. However, people should also realize that in this self-indulging era, they should always have huge savings, which can be used in their time of need. Nevertheless, the government should provide economic support to aged people, if they do not have any savings or back up.
In conclusion, it is essential for every individual should provide monetary help to his parents to the best of his ability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...but if they are not economically strong, they could seek government aid. It is...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15217391304 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67485549551 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3649636538 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.571428571 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203228609275 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741080471029 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0245198862536 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123248776259 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385394321736 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.