IN SOME COUNTRIES, TEENAGERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO DO PART-TIME JOBS BY SOME PEOPLE. OTHERS DISAGREE.
DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINION.
Over the decades, in many countries around the globe, youths are working during their casual time. It has remained disputable among certain demographics of society. These people believe youngsters are motivated toward the path leading to career growth in future. Whereas, some people completely disagree with this practise. The essay will discuss both the topics with relevant reasons and examples.
Encouraging teenagers to work from an early age is a good approach for their potential years. Helping them to shape their career and earn money for their personal expenses such as, paying rent, college fees, and many others. In addition, youth become confident, can handle soft to hard situations, gain life long experience as well as become strong enough to grow progressively. Research conducted in Australia shows that out of 100, 80 people younger generation are international students who are working for rental and University fees. For these reasons jobs are as important as study.
Few parents mention, teenagers are more fragile and need proper attention and care. Moreover, the most important period of life where they choose their study for their upcoming career. Educational study zones may deviate, if one opt for a job at the young learning age. This may include loss of dedication, understanding, knowledge, and idea to name but a few. Part-time work may never give what an appropriate guideline can lead one towards success.
In conclusion, there have been several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly claim that the benefits of teenagers working far outweighs not working ones. Guardians are correct on one note that their education may hamper in a greater way but there are some who are bound to do work for their living and supporting family.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...oward the path leading to career growth in future. Whereas, some people completely disagr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ath leading to career growth in future. Whereas, some people completely disagree with t...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ics with relevant reasons and examples. Encouraging teenagers to work from the e...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun other seems to be countable; consider using: 'many others'.
Suggestion: many others
...such as, paying rent, college fees, and many other. In addition, youth become confident, c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reasons job are as important as study. Few parents mention, teenagers are more ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, well, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22027972028 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62712158314 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685314685315 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8518027147 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8235294118 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177376250289 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499893760492 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465120090318 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100805819791 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441468478826 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.