In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university
studies.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this
Owing to the tremendous growth in the industrialisation and globalisation, acquiring university education has become quite difficult for students in many countries for which they have to work or travel prior to take admissions. This phenomenon has various benefits such as the provision of financial assistance and gaining of experience. Also, the lack of interest in studies and diversion of mind towards money are some drawbacks associated with this.
To embark on, there a plethora of advantages of employment done before starting university studies. Primarily, it is an undeniable fact, that the expenses of higher education are extremely high which a middle-class person hardly afford, in such situations, earning employment provides financial assistance to students. Secondly, travelling or working after graduating from secondary institutions, add an experience to face the challenges of university life. For instance, many elite universities in Canada, offer direct admission to the students holding an experience of the same field in which they have applied for studies.
On the other hand, there are some disadvantages to this trend which can prove detrimental to the development of juvenile. Firstly, the gap between the studies can lead to the loss of interest of studies among the students, consequently, leading to the stoppage of studies. Next, the youngsters involved in employment often become money-minded and leave their studies for the sake of earning wealth. To exemplify, according to a study in the USA, 20% of the students emerged in work did not resume their studies after passing out from the school.
In conclusion, a gap before acquiring university education is beneficial in terms of economic help and expertise, however, this phenomenon can diminish the interest of students in studies and can make them money-oriented. Therefore, it is necessary to measure all the repercussions before attempting any trend.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53691275168 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1689012367 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56711409396 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.467590382 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.923076923 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139882025785 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487174780315 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316472681141 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0819566291514 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416912247466 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.